ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00736099-10ec143b

Old Lina vs New Lina: Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Uric Acid

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Old Lina vs New Lina: Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Uric Acid. Trial comparisons, record NCT00736099-10ec143b. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00736099-10ec143b

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.08190.06910.0968wilson
Risk in group 20.08290.06310.108wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.000999-0.02930.0238newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9880.7181.36log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.9870.6971.4log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Old Lina than on New Lina1,000from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Old LinaPatients pre-treated with linagliptin1241,514OG000
Group 2New LinaPatients pre-treated with placebo48579OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Number of Patients With Abnormalities in Clinical Chemistry: Uric Acid
Description
For this laboratory parameter, a possibly clinically significant abnormality is defined as a value greater than 11 mg/dL for male and as a value greater than 10 mg/dL for female patients.
Time frame
78 weeks
Population
Treated Set with values for Uric acid

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Safety and Efficacy of Linagliptin (BI 1356) as Monotherapy or in Combination in Type 2 DM
NCT number
NCT00736099
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Interventions
linagliptine 5 mg, linagliptine 5 mg and pioglitazone 30 mg
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Results first posted
2012-03-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00736099-10ec143b