ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00756600-e813be3d

Regional Anesthesia vs General Anesthesia: Psychomotor Interventions

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Regional Anesthesia vs General Anesthesia: Psychomotor Interventions. Trial comparisons, record NCT00756600-e813be3d. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00756600-e813be3d

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.03740.01910.072wilson
Risk in group 20.02330.01070.05wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.014-0.01830.0509newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.60.5644.54log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.620.5554.76log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Regional Anesthesia than on General Anesthesia71.2from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Regional AnesthesiaRegional Anesthesia: Up to 2.5 mg/kg bupivacaine administered by caudal or subarachnoid routes or both caudal and subarachnoid or subarachnoid and ilioinguinal nerve blockade. Single shot.8214OG000
Group 2General Anesthesia
General Anesthesia: Sevoflurane for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia, dose up to 8% inspired for duration of procedure plus bupivacaine local anesthetic blockade (up to 2.5 mg/kg) administered via caudal or ilioinguinal nerve block.
6257OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Psychomotor Interventions
Description
Psychomotor issues/interventions. These variables will be summarised using descriptive statistics by treatment arm only. No treatment effect or confidence intervals will be calculated.
Time frame
At 5 years chronological age
Population
Not all participants had data collected for this Outcome Measure due to absence at follow up visit.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Multi-site Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Regional and General Anesthesia for Effects on Neurodevelopmental Outcome and Apnea in Infants
NCT number
NCT00756600
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Inguinal Hernia
Interventions
Regional Anesthesia, General Anesthesia
Lead sponsor
Boston Children's Hospital
Results first posted
2020-04-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00756600-e813be3d