ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00783263-e39e2b03

Rosuvastatin (5 or 10 mg) + Ezetimibe 10 mg vs Rosuvastatin (10 or 20 mg): Number of Participants Who Reached Their Target LDL-C Level

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Rosuvastatin (5 or 10 mg) + Ezetimibe 10 mg vs Rosuvastatin (10 or 20 mg): Number of Participants Who Reached Their Target LDL-C Level. Trial comparisons, record NCT00783263-e39e2b03. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00783263-e39e2b03

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.5940.5270.657wilson
Risk in group 20.3090.2510.373wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.2850.1930.37newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.921.532.41log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 23.272.24.85log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Rosuvastatin (5 or 10 mg) + Ezetimibe 10 mg than on Rosuvastatin (10 or 20 mg)3.512.75.19from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Rosuvastatin (5 or 10 mg) + Ezetimibe 10 mgParticipants who received open label rosuvastatin 5 mg tablets once daily for 4 to 5 weeks then received 10 mg ezetimibe tablets once daily plus 5 mg rosuvastatin for an additional 6 weeks.130219OG000
Group 2Rosuvastatin (10 or 20 mg)Participants who received rosuvastatin (5 or 10 mg) mg tablets once daily for 4 to 5 weeks then received rosuvastatin (10 or 20 mg) once daily for 6 additional weeks.67217OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants Who Reached Their Target LDL-C Level
Description
Participants were analyzed to evaluate the LDL-C (\<100 mg/dL for moderately high risk patients and high risk patients without AVD and \<70 mg/dL for high risk patients with AVD) lowering efficacy with the addition of ezetimibe 10 mg to (5 or 10 mg) compared with doubling the baseline rosuvastatin (10 or 20 mg), daily for 6 weeks of treatment.
Time frame
6 weeks of treatment
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study of Ezetimibe Added On to Rosuvastatin Versus Up Titration of Rosuvastatin in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia (MK0653-139)
NCT number
NCT00783263
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Hypercholesterolemia
Interventions
Comparator: rosuvastatin 5 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg, Comparator: rosuvastatin 10 mg, Comparator: rosuvastatin 10 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg, Comparator: rosuvastatin 20 mg
Lead sponsor
Organon and Co
Results first posted
2011-09-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00783263-e39e2b03