ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00809146-decdcc5d

IM Midazolam vs IV Lorazepam: Number of Subjects With IV Injection-site Complications

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. IM Midazolam vs IV Lorazepam: Number of Subjects With IV Injection-site Complications. Trial comparisons, record NCT00809146-decdcc5d. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00809146-decdcc5d

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 100.0000000000000000008670.0085wilson
Risk in group 20.006740.00230.0196wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.00674-0.01960.00285newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on IM Midazolam than on IV Lorazepam148from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1IM MidazolamSubjects in whom the study IM autoinjector contained active treatment with midazolam0448OG000
Group 2IV LorazepamSubjects in whom the study IV infusion contained active treatment with lorazepam3445OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Subjects With IV Injection-site Complications
Description
IV insertion site complications are defined as any symptoms or signs of injury or reaction at the site of the study IV placed by paramedics and used for study medication. This includes thrombosis, phlebitis, or skin infection requiring specific treatment including compresses, antibiotics, or wound care.
Time frame
participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 6 days
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Paramedic Treatment of Prolonged Seizures by Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Anticonvulsant Medications
NCT number
NCT00809146
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Status Epilepticus
Interventions
Intramuscular route of active treatment, Intravenous route of active treatment
Lead sponsor
Robert Silbergleit
Results first posted
2012-04-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00809146-decdcc5d