ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00809146-sae

IM Midazolam vs IV Lorazepam: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. IM Midazolam vs IV Lorazepam: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00809146-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00809146-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2670.230.306wilson
Risk in group 20.3060.2680.348wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0399-0.0950.0155newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.870.7161.06log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.8220.6271.08log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on IM Midazolam than on IV Lorazepam25from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1IM MidazolamSubjects in whom the study IM autoinjector contained active treatment with midazolam137514EG000
Group 2IV LorazepamSubjects in whom the study IV infusion contained active treatment with lorazepam156509EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Serious adverse events were collected through subject end of study (emergency department or hospital discharge).

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Paramedic Treatment of Prolonged Seizures by Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Anticonvulsant Medications
NCT number
NCT00809146
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Status Epilepticus
Interventions
Intramuscular route of active treatment, Intravenous route of active treatment
Lead sponsor
Robert Silbergleit
Results first posted
2012-04-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00809146-sae