ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00817063-2054aefb

Alitretinoin 30 mg vs Placebo: Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Patient Global Assessment (PaGA) at End-of-treatment

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Alitretinoin 30 mg vs Placebo: Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Patient Global Assessment (PaGA) at End-of-treatment. Trial comparisons, record NCT00817063-2054aefb. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00817063-2054aefb

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.3930.3390.449wilson
Risk in group 20.1380.1030.181wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.2550.1860.321newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 22.852.083.92log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 24.052.716.07log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Alitretinoin 30 mg than on Placebo3.923.115.38from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Alitretinoin 30 mgParticipants with severe CHE rated as refractory during the run-in period were randomized to receive 30 mg of alitretinoin oral soft capsule once daily up to 24 weeks.117298OG000
Group 2PlaceboParticipants with severe CHE rated as refractory during the run-in period were randomized to receive matching Placebo oral soft capsule once daily up to 24 weeks.41298OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Patient Global Assessment (PaGA) at End-of-treatment
Description
At Week 24 or at the end-of-treatment participants were asked by the investigator to grade their overall change from Baseline by selecting one of the following descriptions, which best matched their perception of overall treatment effect: cleared or almost cleared (at least 90% clearing), marked improvement (at least 75% clearing), moderate improvement (at least 50% clearing), mild improvement (at least 25% clearing), no change and worsening. Participants were considered as responders when the PaGa was cleared or almost cleared.
Time frame
Week 24 (end-of-treatment)
Population
ITT Population.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Efficacy and Safety of a Retinoid in the Treatment of Severe Chronic Hand Eczema
NCT number
NCT00817063
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Eczema
Interventions
alitretinoin, Placebo
Lead sponsor
Stiefel, a GSK Company
Results first posted
2017-11-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00817063-2054aefb