ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00829686-8719fa83

Septra DS vs No Intervention: Clinical Improvement at 7 Days After Incision and Drainage

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Septra DS vs No Intervention: Clinical Improvement at 7 Days After Incision and Drainage. Trial comparisons, record NCT00829686-8719fa83. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00829686-8719fa83

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.7780.5480.91wilson
Risk in group 20.7690.4970.918wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00855-0.2650.311newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.010.6871.49log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.050.1915.76log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Septra DS than on No Intervention117from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: no intervention.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Septra DSSeptra DS (800/160) two pills PO BID x 7 days1418OG001
Group 2No InterventionNo antibiotic1013OG000

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Clinical Improvement at 7 Days After Incision and Drainage
Description
improving wound without evidence of fever, worsening cellulitis or induration
Time frame
7 days
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Trial of Antibiotic Treatment for Skin Abscess in Patients at Risk for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Infection
NCT number
NCT00829686
Phases
NA
Conditions
Abscess
Interventions
Septra
Lead sponsor
59th Medical Wing
Results first posted
2009-07-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00829686-8719fa83