Comparison · NCT00849121-315f441f
1: pTVG-HP With rhGM-CSF Every 3 Months Post Week 12 vs 2: pTVG-HP With rhGM-CSF Variable Dosing Post Week 12: The Number of Participants Who Experience at Least a Two-fold Increase in the PSA Doubling Time During the Treatment Period.
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. 1: pTVG-HP With rhGM-CSF Every 3 Months Post Week 12 vs 2: pTVG-HP With rhGM-CSF Variable Dosing Post Week 12: The Number of Participants Who Experience at Least a Two-fold Increase in the PSA Doubling Time During the Treatment Period. Trial comparisons, record NCT00849121-315f441f. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00849121-315f441f
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.375 | 0.137 | 0.694 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.444 | 0.189 | 0.733 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | -0.0694 | -0.444 | 0.34 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.844 | 0.266 | 2.68 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.75 | 0.107 | 5.24 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on 1: pTVG-HP With rhGM-CSF Every 3 Months Post Week 12 than on 2: pTVG-HP With rhGM-CSF Variable Dosing Post Week 12 | 14.4 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 1: pTVG-HP With rhGM-CSF Every 3 Months Post Week 12 | Intradermal vaccinations of a DNA vaccine encoding PAP, with GM-CSF as an adjuvant given every 2 weeks for the first 12 weeks, then every 12 weeks until disease progression.~pTVG-HP with rhGM-CSF: pTVG-HP (100 µg) with rhGM-CSF (200 µg) administered i.d. biweekly for 6 total doses, followed by pTVG-HP (100 µg) with rhGM-CSF (200 µg) administered i.d. every 3 months until radiographic disease progression | 3 | 8 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | 2: pTVG-HP With rhGM-CSF Variable Dosing Post Week 12 | Intradermal vaccinations of a DNA vaccine encoding PAP, with GM-CSF as an adjuvant given every 2 weeks for the first 12 weeks, then given every 2-week, 4-week, or 3-month intervals as dictated by cellular immune response measurement.~pTVG-HP with rhGM-CSF: pTVG-HP (100 µg) with rhGM-CSF (200 µg) administered i.d. biweekly for a minimum of 6 total doses, and continuing biweekly until evidence of T-cell immune response, and then following a booster schedule as defined by evidence of T-cell immune response. | 4 | 9 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- SECONDARY
- Title
- The Number of Participants Who Experience at Least a Two-fold Increase in the PSA Doubling Time During the Treatment Period.
- Description
The number of subjects who experience at least a two-fold increase in the PSA doubling time will be documented for each study arm. The PSA doubling time will be calculated using all PSA values obtained starting on Treatment Day 0 and continuing to end of treatment period and compared to the PSA doubling time collected at study entry prior to beginning study treatment.
- Time frame
- Starting at Treatment Day 0 and continuing every 4-6 weeks until end of treatment period, an average of 2 years
- Population
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Two-Arm Study of a DNA Vaccine Encoding Prostatic Acid Phosphatase (PAP) in Patients With Non-Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer
- NCT number
- NCT00849121
- Phases
- PHASE2
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Interventions
- pTVG-HP with rhGM-CSF, pTVG-HP with rhGM-CSF
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Results first posted
- 2014-09-11
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00849121?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00849121-315f441f