ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00858364-c2bd4ace

Darbepoetin Alfa vs Placebo: Number of Participants Who Developed Neutralizing Antibodies to Darbepoetin Alfa

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Darbepoetin Alfa vs Placebo: Number of Participants Who Developed Neutralizing Antibodies to Darbepoetin Alfa. Trial comparisons, record NCT00858364-c2bd4ace. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00858364-c2bd4ace

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 1000.00239wilson
Risk in group 2000.00476wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.004760.00239newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treatfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Darbepoetin Alfa
Participants received darbepoetin alfa 500 µg once every 3 weeks (Q3W) administered subcutaneously until 3 weeks after the completion of chemotherapy or upon determination of disease progression, whichever occurred first.
01,606OG001
Group 2Placebo
Participants received placebo once every 3 weeks (Q3W) administered subcutaneously until 3 weeks after the completion of chemotherapy or upon determination of disease progression, whichever occurred first.
0803OG000

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants Who Developed Neutralizing Antibodies to Darbepoetin Alfa
Description
Developing antibody incidence was defined as neutralizing antibody positive postbaseline with a negative or no result at baseline.
Time frame
Baseline and end of the efficacy treatment period (EOETP; defined as 21 days after either the last dose of study drug or the last dose of chemotherapy, whichever was later. the median (range) duration of treatment was 10 (1 to 106) weeks in both groups.
Population
Randomized and consented participants who received at least one dose of study drug and with a postbaseline result.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Anemia Treatment for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Receiving Chemotherapy
NCT number
NCT00858364
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Anemia, Cancer, Lung Cancer
Interventions
Darbepoetin alfa, Placebo
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Results first posted
2018-07-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00858364-c2bd4ace