ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00911508-ba85cc2e

Left Atrial Ablation vs Rate or Rhythm Control Therapy: Number of Participants Free From Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Following the 90 Day Blanking Period

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Left Atrial Ablation vs Rate or Rhythm Control Therapy: Number of Participants Free From Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Following the 90 Day Blanking Period. Trial comparisons, record NCT00911508-ba85cc2e. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00911508-ba85cc2e

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.4990.460.539wilson
Risk in group 20.6950.6580.729wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.196-0.248-0.141newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.7190.6540.79log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.4380.3470.552log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Left Atrial Ablation than on Rate or Rhythm Control Therapy5.114.037.07from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Left Atrial Ablation
All patients randomized to the ablation group were required to undergo left atrial pulmonary vein isolation. The addition of ancillary ablation techniques including linear, ganglion plexus, and electrogram-based approaches were left to the discretion of the investigators.
305611OG000
Group 2Rate or Rhythm Control TherapyAll patients randomized to drug therapy, were treated with standard rhythm and/or rate control drugs selected in accordance with contemporary guidelines, according to investigator discretion.437629OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants Free From Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Following the 90 Day Blanking Period
Description
Data from patients using the study provided ECG event recording system were analyzed. A 30-second episode of AF in either group, confirmed through blinded review by an ECG Core Lab Committee was used for defining the endpoint of recurrent AF.
Time frame
From date of therapy initiation until date of first AF recurrence following a 90 day wait (blanking) period over a median follow-up of 48.5 months.
Population
Subjects were analyzed in the post-blanking period if randomized treatment occurred and the subject did not die, withdraw, or get lost to follow-up before the end of the 90 day blanking period.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Catheter Ablation vs Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial
NCT number
NCT00911508
Phases
NA
Conditions
Atrial Fibrillation, Arrhythmia
Interventions
Left atrial ablation, Rate or Rhythm Control Therapy
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Results first posted
2019-08-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00911508-ba85cc2e