ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00911937-sae

Fesoterodine vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Fesoterodine vs Placebo: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00911937-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00911937-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.01080.004620.025wilson
Risk in group 20.0190.010.0357wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.00819-0.0260.00863newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.5690.1921.68log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.5640.1881.7log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Fesoterodine than on Placebo122from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1FesoterodineFesoterodine 4 mg oral tablet once daily for 4 weeks followed by dose-escalation to 8 mg once daily depending on investigator's discretion for remaining 8 weeks.5463EG001
Group 2Placebo
Placebo matched to fesoterodine 4 milligram (mg) oral tablet once daily for 4 weeks followed by placebo matched to fesoterodine 8 mg once daily depending on dose escalation as per investigator's discretion for remaining 8 weeks.
9474EG000

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Fesoterodine In Patients With Symptoms Of Overactive Bladder Including Nocturnal Urinary Urgency
NCT number
NCT00911937
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Overactive Bladder
Interventions
Fesoterodine, Placebo
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Results first posted
2012-08-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00911937-sae