ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00965731-sae

PF-02341066 (200 mg) and Erlotinib (100 mg) vs PF-02341066 (150 mg) and Erlotinib (100 mg): serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. PF-02341066 (200 mg) and Erlotinib (100 mg) vs PF-02341066 (150 mg) and Erlotinib (100 mg): serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00965731-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00965731-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2860.08220.641wilson
Risk in group 20.40.2190.613wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.114-0.4090.285newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.7140.1972.59log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.60.09273.89log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on PF-02341066 (200 mg) and Erlotinib (100 mg) than on PF-02341066 (150 mg) and Erlotinib (100 mg)8.75from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1PF-02341066 (200 mg) and Erlotinib (100 mg)
PF-02341066 200 milligrams (mg) administered orally twice daily (BID) in combination with erlotinib 100 mg administered orally once daily (QD) in a continuous schedule for 28 days (Cycle 1) and then in continuous 21-day cycles. Prior to combination treatment, participants completed a 7 to 14 day lead-in period where they received erlotinib 100 mg administered orally QD.
27EG000
Group 2PF-02341066 (150 mg) and Erlotinib (100 mg)
PF-02341066 150 mg administered orally BID in combination with erlotinib 100 mg administered orally QD in a continuous schedule for 28 days (Cycle 1) and then in continuous 21-day cycles. Prior to combination treatment, participants completed a 7 to 14 day lead-in period where they received erlotinib 100 mg administered orally QD.
820EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 20 months)

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Erlotinib Is Being Studied With Or Without An Investigational Drug, PF-02341066, In Patients With Lung Cancer
NCT number
NCT00965731
Phases
PHASE1
Conditions
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Interventions
Erlotinib, Erlotinib, PF-02341066
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Results first posted
2013-01-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00965731-sae