ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00982397-sae

DR-ICD/CRT-D vs VR-ICD: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. DR-ICD/CRT-D vs VR-ICD: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00982397-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00982397-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2240.2060.243wilson
Risk in group 20.1660.1420.195wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.05740.02410.0886newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.351.121.61log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.441.161.8log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on DR-ICD/CRT-D than on VR-ICD17.411.341.6from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1DR-ICD/CRT-DPatients implanted with a dual-chamber ICD (DR-ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D).4522,019EG000
Group 2VR-ICDPatients implanted with a single-chamber ICD (VR-ICD).125751EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Reported Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) include events starting on or after the date of consent and through study completion, an average of 22 months.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Safety and Clinical Performance of the Protecta ICD and CRT-D
NCT number
NCT00982397
Phases
NA
Conditions
Tachyarrhythmias, Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction
Interventions
Protecta VR-ICD, Protecta DR-ICD or CRT-D
Lead sponsor
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Results first posted
2017-11-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00982397-sae