ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00999609-sae

Intervention vs Control: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Intervention vs Control: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00999609-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00999609-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.10.02790.301wilson
Risk in group 2000.299wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.1-0.2080.301newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Intervention than on Control10from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: control.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1InterventionBilateral subretinal injection of voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (AAV2-hRPE65v2), 1.5x 10e11 vg in a total volume of 0.3ml per eye, administered no fewer than 6 days apart220EG000
Group 2ControlNo intervention, no sham; uninjected control group09EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
1 year post administration (Intervention group), 1 year post baseline (Control group)

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Safety and Efficacy Study in Subjects With Leber Congenital Amaurosis
NCT number
NCT00999609
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Inherited Retinal Dystrophy Due to RPE65 Mutations, Leber Congenital Amaurosis
Interventions
AAV2-hRPE65v2,voretigene neparvovec-rzyl
Lead sponsor
Spark Therapeutics, Inc.
Results first posted
2018-03-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00999609-sae