ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01006538-8e2dddf9

Arm A: Epimacular Bracytherapy + Lucentis® vs Arm B: Lucentis® Only: Percentage of Subjects Gaining ≥ 0 ETDRS Letters

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Arm A: Epimacular Bracytherapy + Lucentis® vs Arm B: Lucentis® Only: Percentage of Subjects Gaining ≥ 0 ETDRS Letters. Trial comparisons, record NCT01006538-8e2dddf9. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01006538-8e2dddf9

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.3730.3150.435wilson
Risk in group 20.4620.3750.552wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0892-0.1960.0177newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.8070.6271.04log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.6920.4441.08log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Arm A: Epimacular Bracytherapy + Lucentis® than on Arm B: Lucentis® Only11.2from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Arm A: Epimacular Bracytherapy + Lucentis®
Arm A: A single surgical procedure with epimacular brachytherapy using the VIDION® System, with Lucentis® (0.5 mg) administered on a monthly basis as required.~Epimacular Brachytherapy: Strontium-90. The device delivers 24 Gray of beta radiation to the CNV lesion. Each device is calibrated for a set duration.
91244OG000
Group 2Arm B: Lucentis® Only
Arm B: Lucentis® (0.5 mg) administered on a monthly basis as required, using the re-treatment criteria below.~Ranibizumab: intravitreal injection (0.5 mg) administered on a monthly basis as required, using the re-treatment criteria
55119OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Percentage of Subjects Gaining ≥ 0 ETDRS Letters
Description
Manifest refraction and BCVA measurements were performed according to the standard procedure originally developed for Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) and adapted for the Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) protocol. Visual acuity testing was measured at a distance of 4 meters and, for subjects with sufficiently reduced vision, at 1 meter. The ETDRS charts consist of 14 lines, each comprising a series of 5 letters of equal difficulty, with standardized spacing between letters and rows (total 70 letters). Minimum is 0 (no letters read at 1 m) and maximum possible is 100 (70 letters read at 4 m + 30). If visual acuity is so poor that the subject cannot read any of the largest letters at 1 meter count fingers (CF), hand movements (HM) and light perception (PL) are tested.~Participants with an improvement in BCVA by more than 0 EDTRS letters at month 12 compared with baseline were considered for this outcome measure.
Time frame
12 months
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Macular EpiRetinal Brachytherapy Versus Lucentis® Only Treatment (MERLOT)
NCT number
NCT01006538
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Macular Degeneration
Interventions
Epimacular Brachytherapy, Ranibizumab
Lead sponsor
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
Results first posted
2019-07-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01006538-8e2dddf9