ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01023841-sae

Bimatoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.03% vs Vehicle Sterile Solution: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Bimatoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.03% vs Vehicle Sterile Solution: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01023841-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01023841-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 100.000000000000000006940.0741wilson
Risk in group 2000.143wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.1430.0741newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harmfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: vehicle.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Bimatoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.03%One drop applied to a sterile single-use-per-eye applicator and applied to upper eyelid margin (where the eyelashes meet the skin) once nightly for 4 months.048EG000
Group 2Vehicle Sterile SolutionOne drop applied to a sterile single-use-per-eye applicator and applied to upper eyelid margin (where the eyelashes meet the skin) once nightly for 4 months.023EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Safety and Efficacy of Bimatoprost Solution in Treating Eyelash Loss or Hypotrichosis in Children
NCT number
NCT01023841
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Eyelash Hypotrichosis, Alopecia Areata
Interventions
bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03%, Vehicle Sterile Solution
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Results first posted
2013-09-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01023841-sae