ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trial comparisons

LCZ696 vs Enalapril: Number of Patients - All-cause Mortality

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Measures 6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNoteSource
Risk in group 10.170.1590.181wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk in group 20.1980.1860.211wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0284-0.045-0.0119newcombe hybrid scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.8570.7830.938logClinicalTrials.gov
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.8270.7410.924logClinicalTrials.gov
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on LCZ696 than on Enalapril35.222.284.3from the risk difference intervalClinicalTrials.gov

Groups 2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov codeSource
Group 1LCZ696
single-blind active run-in period consisted of treatment with enalapril 10 mg bid, followed by LCZ696 100 mg bid, and then LCZ696 200 mg bid over a total duration of 5 to 10 weeks. Temporary down-titration from LCZ696 200 mg bid to LCZ696 100 mg bid was allowed provided the patient was up-titrated back to LCZ696 200 mg bid and tolerated this dose for at least two weeks before being eligible for randomization. LCZ696 200mg BID during double blind treatment period
7114,187OG000ClinicalTrials.gov
Group 2Enalapril
single-blind active run-in period consisted of treatment with enalapril 10 mg bid, followed by LCZ696 100 mg bid, and then LCZ696 200 mg bid over a total duration of 5 to 10 weeks. Temporary down-titration from LCZ696 200 mg bid to LCZ696 100 mg bid was allowed provided the patient was up-titrated back to LCZ696 200 mg bid and tolerated this dose for at least two weeks before being eligible for randomization. Enalapril 10 mg BID during double blind treatment period
8354,212OG001ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcome 5

FieldValueSource
TypeSECONDARYClinicalTrials.gov
TitleNumber of Patients - All-cause MortalityClinicalTrials.gov
DescriptionNumber of patients - All-cause mortality. All-cause mortality is common in Heart Failure HF patients this measures how many patients had this event. The data is on FAS population up to March 31, 2014ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frameup to 51 monthsClinicalTrials.gov
Population
Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients but the following two exclusions: 6 patients who did not qualify for randomization but were inadvertently randomized into the study and did not receive double-blind study medication; 37 patients because they were randomized at sites that were closed due to serious GCP violations
ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial 8

FieldValueSource
TitleThis Study Will Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril on Morbidity and Mortality of Patients With Chronic Heart FailureClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT01035255ClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesPHASE3ClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsHeart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsLCZ696 200 mg BID, Enalapril 10 mg BIDClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2015-09-07ClinicalTrials.gov
Results on ClinicalTrials.govhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01035255?tab=resultsClinicalTrials.gov

Source 4

FieldValueSource
Releasetrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-256f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57ClinicalTrials.gov
AACT copy2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
Tables readoutcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquetClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.