ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01059903-sae

Rotigotine PR2.2.1 vs Rotigotine PR2.1.1: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Rotigotine PR2.2.1 vs Rotigotine PR2.1.1: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01059903-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01059903-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 100.000000000000000006940.0727wilson
Risk in group 200.000000000000000006940.0727wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.07270.0727newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harmfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Rotigotine PR2.2.1Rotigotine transdermal patch 4.5 mg/10 cm\^2, test drug product PR2.2.1 ; single application of 1 patch for 24 hours049EG000
Group 2Rotigotine PR2.1.1Rotigotine transdermal patch 4.5 mg/10 cm\^2, reference drug product PR2.1.1 ; single application of 1 patch for 24 hours049EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Adverse Events were collected up to 14 days after the last patch removal.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Study in Healthy Volunteers to Prove That Two Different Formulations of Rotigotine Patches Deliver Equivalent Drug Amount to the Body
NCT number
NCT01059903
Phases
PHASE1
Conditions
Healthy Volunteers
Interventions
Rotigotine transdermal patch
Lead sponsor
UCB Pharma
Results first posted
2011-03-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01059903-sae