ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01101334-a3cab901

CS-7017 Plus Erlotinib vs Erlotinib: Overall Response Rate Following Administration of CS-7017 and Erlotinib in Participants With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Failed First Line Therapy

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. CS-7017 Plus Erlotinib vs Erlotinib: Overall Response Rate Following Administration of CS-7017 and Erlotinib in Participants With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Failed First Line Therapy. Trial comparisons, record NCT01101334-a3cab901. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01101334-a3cab901

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2050.1120.345wilson
Risk in group 20.20.1090.338wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00455-0.1620.172newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.020.4482.33log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.030.3662.89log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on CS-7017 Plus Erlotinib than on Erlotinib220from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1CS-7017 Plus ErlotinibParticipants who received two 0.25 mg CS-7017 tablets administered twice daily and one 150 mg erlotinib tablet administered once daily.944OG000
Group 2ErlotinibParticipants who received one 150 mg erlotinib tablet administered once daily.945OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Overall Response Rate Following Administration of CS-7017 and Erlotinib in Participants With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Failed First Line Therapy
Description
The overall response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants who achieved best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR); ORR = CR + PR. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions, CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions.
Time frame
Baseline to disease progression or death, up to approximately 2.5 years
Population
ORR was assessed in the Full Analysis Set.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Study of Erlotinib With or Without Investigational Drug (CS-7017) in Subjects With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT number
NCT01101334
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Interventions
CS-7017, erlotinib
Lead sponsor
Daiichi Sankyo
Results first posted
2020-06-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01101334-a3cab901