ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01121666-sae

AFOLIA-150 (Follitropin Alfa) vs Gonal-f® (Follitropin Alfa): serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. AFOLIA-150 (Follitropin Alfa) vs Gonal-f® (Follitropin Alfa): serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01121666-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01121666-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.04820.02780.0823wilson
Risk in group 20.02440.008330.0693wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0238-0.02550.0615newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.980.5686.87log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.030.5617.31log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on AFOLIA-150 (Follitropin Alfa) than on Gonal-f® (Follitropin Alfa)42from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1AFOLIA-150 (Follitropin Alfa)Follitropin alfa: 150IU per day subcutaneously for a maximum of 16 days12249EG000
Group 2Gonal-f® (Follitropin Alfa)Follitropin alfa: 150IU per day subcutaneously for a maximum of 16 days3123EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Study period + 30 days

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Multi-centre Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of AFOLIA and Gonal-f in Women for Assisted Reproductive Treatment
NCT number
NCT01121666
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Infertility
Interventions
Follitropin alfa
Lead sponsor
Finox AG
Results first posted
2016-04-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01121666-sae