ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01124786-sae

CO-1.01 vs Gemcitabine: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. CO-1.01 vs Gemcitabine: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01124786-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01124786-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.4580.3870.531wilson
Risk in group 20.4530.3820.526wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00506-0.09680.107newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.010.8071.27log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.020.6741.55log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on CO-1.01 than on Gemcitabine198from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1CO-1.01CO-1.01 : 1250 mg/m2 intravenous infusion weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks82179EG000
Group 2GemcitabineGemcitabine : 1000 mg/m2 intravenous infusion weekly for 7 weeks followed by 1 week rest, then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks82181EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Adverse events were assessed from the time of informed consent to 28 days after the last study drug administration, up to 1.5 years.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study Comparing CO-1.01 With Gemcitabine as First Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (LEAP)
NCT number
NCT01124786
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Interventions
CO-1.01, Gemcitabine
Lead sponsor
Clovis Oncology, Inc.
Results first posted
2014-04-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01124786-sae