ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01142388-sae

Arm I (Paclitaxel) vs Arm II (Cixutumumab, Paclitaxel): serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Arm I (Paclitaxel) vs Arm II (Cixutumumab, Paclitaxel): serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01142388-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01142388-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.5250.3750.671wilson
Risk in group 20.5230.3790.662wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00227-0.2030.207newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 210.6681.51log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.010.4282.38log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Arm I (Paclitaxel) than on Arm II (Cixutumumab, Paclitaxel)440from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Arm I (Paclitaxel)Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 1 hour at a dose of 80 mg/m\^2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28 day cycle.~paclitaxel: Given IV2140EG000
Group 2Arm II (Cixutumumab, Paclitaxel)
Patients receive cixutumumab IV over 1 hour at a dose of 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle, and paclitaxel as in Arm I.~cixutumumab: Given IV, administered prior to chemotherapy, doses were based on actual body weight~paclitaxel: Given IV
2344EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Assessed at the end of each cycle (1 cycle=28 days) while on treatment and for 30 days after the end of treatment

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Paclitaxel With or Without Cixutumumab as Second-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer
NCT number
NCT01142388
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Metastatic Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Metastatic Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma, Recurrent Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Recurrent Esophageal Carcinoma, Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Recurrent Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma, Stage IV Esophageal Cancer AJCC v7
Interventions
Cixutumumab, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Paclitaxel, Pharmacological Study
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Results first posted
2015-06-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01142388-sae