ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01151345-sae

Tilazem 60 mg vs Angiotrofin 60 mg: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Tilazem 60 mg vs Angiotrofin 60 mg: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01151345-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01151345-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 100.00000000000000001390.133wilson
Risk in group 200.00000000000000001390.133wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.1330.133newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harmfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Tilazem 60 mgSingle oral dose of 60 mg Diltiazem tablet (Tilazem®) in either first intervention period or second intervention period.025EG000
Group 2Angiotrofin 60 mgSingle oral dose of 60 mg Diltiazem tablet (Angiotrofin®) in either first intervention period or second intervention period.025EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Bioequivalence Study Of Diltiazem In 60 Mg Tablets As Tilazem 60® Made by Pfizer, S.A. De C.V., Versus Angiotrofin® 60 Mg Made by Amstrong Laboratorios De Mexico, S.A. De C.V.
NCT number
NCT01151345
Phases
PHASE1
Conditions
Healthy
Interventions
TILACEM, ANGIOTROFIN
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Results first posted
2011-08-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01151345-sae