Comparison · NCT01170221-0616ea52
Tedizolid Phosphate vs Linezolid: Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Success at the Post Treatment Evaluation Visit
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Tedizolid Phosphate vs Linezolid: Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Success at the Post Treatment Evaluation Visit. Trial comparisons, record NCT01170221-0616ea52. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01170221-0616ea52
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.855 | 0.814 | 0.889 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.86 | 0.818 | 0.893 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | -0.00428 | -0.0577 | 0.0491 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.995 | 0.935 | 1.06 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.966 | 0.625 | 1.49 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Tedizolid Phosphate than on Linezolid | 234 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Tedizolid Phosphate | Oral tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once daily for six days followed by four days of placebo | 284 | 332 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Linezolid | Oral linezolid 600 mg twice daily for 10 days | 288 | 335 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- SECONDARY
- Title
- Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Success at the Post Treatment Evaluation Visit
- Description
Clinical success defined as resolution/near resolution of most disease-specific signs and symptoms, absence/near resolution of systemic signs of infection, if present at baseline, no new signs, symptoms, or complications attributable to the ABSSSIs so no further antibiotic therapy was required for the treatment of the primary lesion.
- Time frame
- Post-Treatment Evaluation (7-14 days after the End of Therapy)
- Population
- The Intent to Treat analysis set included data from all randomized participants.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- TR-701 FA vs. Linezolid for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.
- NCT number
- NCT01170221
- Phases
- PHASE3
- Conditions
- Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial Infections
- Interventions
- TR-701 FA, Linezolid
- Lead sponsor
- Trius Therapeutics LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)
- Results first posted
- 2014-09-03
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01170221?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01170221-0616ea52