Comparison · NCT01170221-11cb4f3c
Tedizolid Phosphate vs Linezolid: Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Response at the Day 7 Visit
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Tedizolid Phosphate vs Linezolid: Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Response at the Day 7 Visit. Trial comparisons, record NCT01170221-11cb4f3c. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01170221-11cb4f3c
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.91 | 0.874 | 0.936 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.893 | 0.855 | 0.921 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0.0171 | -0.0288 | 0.0631 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.02 | 0.969 | 1.07 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.21 | 0.728 | 2.02 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Tedizolid Phosphate than on Linezolid | 58.5 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Tedizolid Phosphate | Oral tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once daily for six days followed by four days of placebo | 302 | 332 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Linezolid | Oral linezolid 600 mg twice daily for 10 days | 299 | 335 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- SECONDARY
- Title
- Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Response at the Day 7 Visit
- Description
- Clinical improvement was defined as improvement in overall clinical status.
- Time frame
- Day 7
- Population
- The Intent to Treat analysis set includes data from all randomized participants.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- TR-701 FA vs. Linezolid for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.
- NCT number
- NCT01170221
- Phases
- PHASE3
- Conditions
- Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial Infections
- Interventions
- TR-701 FA, Linezolid
- Lead sponsor
- Trius Therapeutics LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)
- Results first posted
- 2014-09-03
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01170221?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01170221-11cb4f3c