ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01170221-sae

Tedizolid Phosphate vs Linezolid: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Tedizolid Phosphate vs Linezolid: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01170221-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01170221-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.01510.006470.0349wilson
Risk in group 20.01190.004650.0303wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00317-0.01710.0242newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.270.3434.67log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.270.3384.77log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Tedizolid Phosphate than on Linezolid316from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Tedizolid PhosphateOral tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once daily for six days followed by four days of placebo5331EG000
Group 2LinezolidOral linezolid 600 mg twice daily for 10 days4335EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Collected from signing of the ICF through the late follow-up visit (up to 38 days).

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
TR-701 FA vs. Linezolid for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.
NCT number
NCT01170221
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial Infections
Interventions
TR-701 FA, Linezolid
Lead sponsor
Trius Therapeutics LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)
Results first posted
2014-09-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01170221-sae