ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01183104-a6a8df34

Sitagliptin vs Glimepiride: The Number of Participants Achieving HbA1c < 6.9 %

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Sitagliptin vs Glimepiride: The Number of Participants Achieving HbA1c < 6.9 %. Trial comparisons, record NCT01183104-a6a8df34. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01183104-a6a8df34

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.6640.5810.739wilson
Risk in group 20.6720.5870.747wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0077-0.120.105newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9890.8331.17log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.9660.5771.62log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Sitagliptin than on Glimepiride130from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1SitagliptinStarting dose for sitagliptin is 50mg per day, can be increased up to 100mg (25-50mg; eGFR 30=\< \<50).89134OG000
Group 2GlimepirideStarting dose for glimepiride is 0.5mg per day, can be increased up to 6.0mg86128OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
The Number of Participants Achieving HbA1c < 6.9 %
Description
Time frame
52 W
Population
Analysis set of evaluation for efficacy; Per Protocol Set Some participants were not completed to 52 W.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
START-J: SiTAgliptin in eldeRly Trial in Japan
NCT number
NCT01183104
Phases
NA
Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes
Interventions
Sitagliptin, Glimepiride
Lead sponsor
Japan Association for Diabetes Education and Care
Results first posted
2017-04-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01183104-a6a8df34