ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01200238-sae

STA-9090: Cohort A vs STA-9090: Cohort B: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. STA-9090: Cohort A vs STA-9090: Cohort B: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01200238-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01200238-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2860.08220.641wilson
Risk in group 20.90.5960.982wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.614-0.834-0.147newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.3170.09661.04log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.04440.003180.621log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on STA-9090: Cohort A than on STA-9090: Cohort B1.631.26.82from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1STA-9090: Cohort A
Cohort A participants received STA-9090 200 mg/m2 given intravenously (IV) over 1 hour once weekly (d1, 8, 15 of a 28 day cycle).~Participants were treated until evidence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, intercurrent illness or withdrawal.
27EG000
Group 2STA-9090: Cohort B
Cohort B participants received STA-9090 150 mg/m2 given intravenously over 1 hour (IV) twice weekly (d1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18 of a 28 day cycle).~Participants were treated until evidence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, intercurrent illness or withdrawal.
910EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
AE assessment was ongoing from the start of study drug and up to day 30 post-treatment; AEs were assessed for the median treatment duration of 1.8 months for each cohort and up to 12.5m in Cohort A and up to 31.7m in Cohort B and then add the 30 days post-treatment.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
STA-9090(Ganetespib) in Metastatic Ocular Melanoma
NCT number
NCT01200238
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Ocular Melanoma
Interventions
STA-9090
Lead sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Results first posted
2018-06-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01200238-sae