ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01205776-02e1cf4d

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Bleeding

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Number of Participants With Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Bleeding. Trial comparisons, record NCT01205776-02e1cf4d. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01205776-02e1cf4d

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1150.09620.137wilson
Risk in group 20.1520.130.176wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0365-0.0671-0.00599newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.7590.6020.957log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.7280.5570.95log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) than on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)27.414.9167from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)Those patients receiving the XIENCE PRIME™ EECSS or XIENCE V® EECSS or XIENCE Xpedition™ EECSS or XIENCE PRO EECSS109948OG000
Group 2Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)Those patients receiving Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)145957OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Bleeding
Description
Type 0: no bleeding Type 1: bleeding that is not actionable\&does not cause the patient to seek unscheduled performance of studies,hospitalization,or treatment by a healthcare professional Type 2: any overt, actionable sign of hemorrhage that does not fit the criteria for type 3,4,or 5 but does meet at least 1 of the following criteria:requiring nonsurgical, medical intervention by a healthcare professional; leading to hospitalization or increased level of care; prompting evaluation.~Type 3 Type 3a~* Overt bleeding plus hemoglobin drop of 3 to \< 5 g/dL~* Any transfusion with overt bleeding Type 3b~* Overt bleeding plus hemoglobin drop ≥5 g/dL\*~* Cardiac tamponade~* Bleeding requiring surgical intervention for control~* Bleeding requiring intravenous vasoactive agents Type 3c~* Intracranial hemorrhage~* Subcategories confirmed by autopsy or imaging or lumbar puncture~* Intraocular bleed compromising vision Type 4: CABG-related bleeding Type 5: fatal bleeding
Time frame
3 years
Population
ITT Population.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
EXCEL Clinical Trial
NCT number
NCT01205776
Phases
NA
Conditions
Chronic Coronary Occlusion, Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease, Stent Thrombosis, Vascular Disease, Myocardial Ischemia, Coronary Artery Stenosis, Coronary Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Restenosis
Interventions
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, CABG
Lead sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Results first posted
2018-03-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01205776-02e1cf4d