ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01281969-0bbb7ac6

IVIG vs Placebo: The Degree of Treatment Response is Expected to Correlate With the Percentage Reduction in Antinuclear Antibody Titers Following IVIG Administration.

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. IVIG vs Placebo: The Degree of Treatment Response is Expected to Correlate With the Percentage Reduction in Antinuclear Antibody Titers Following IVIG Administration. Trial comparisons, record NCT01281969-0bbb7ac6. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01281969-0bbb7ac6

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.4710.2620.69wilson
Risk in group 20.2780.1250.509wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.193-0.1190.46newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.690.6894.16log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.310.5689.41log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on IVIG than on Placebo5.19from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1IVIGGamunex Intravenous Immunoglobulin: 2.0 gm/kg total, IV (in the vein), over 2 days817OG000
Group 2PlaceboPlacebo: Normal saline, IV (in the vein), over 2 days518OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
The Degree of Treatment Response is Expected to Correlate With the Percentage Reduction in Antinuclear Antibody Titers Following IVIG Administration.
Description
Non-zero values of antinuclear antibodies are considered positive and reflective of an ongoing immune response in the individual. First, the number of participants who were classified at baseline as having positive antinuclear antibodies was calculated (see outcome measure data table, which states the number (AKA count) of participants who had positive antinuclear antibodies at baseline). We hypothesized that improvement in the ongoing immune response, and therefore a reduction in antinuclear antibody titers, would mediate the effect of IVIG on OCD symptom improvement. However, because very few participants were classified as positive at baseline, it was not appropriate to pursue the original question of whether a decline in antinuclear antibodies (i.e., from positive to negative) was related to symptom improvement.
Time frame
Baseline
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Intravenous Immunoglobulin for PANDAS
NCT number
NCT01281969
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Children, Anxiety Disorder, Autoimmune Disease, PANDAS
Interventions
Gamunex Intravenous Immunoglobulin, Placebo
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Results first posted
2020-03-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01281969-0bbb7ac6