Comparison · NCT01312805-ecd689c8
CHICA Control vs CHICA Asthma Module: Diagnosis Rate of Asthma
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. CHICA Control vs CHICA Asthma Module: Diagnosis Rate of Asthma. Trial comparisons, record NCT01312805-ecd689c8. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01312805-ecd689c8
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.0576 | 0.0444 | 0.0744 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.0861 | 0.0704 | 0.105 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | -0.0285 | -0.0516 | -0.00546 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.669 | 0.482 | 0.928 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.649 | 0.456 | 0.922 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on CHICA Control than on CHICA Asthma Module | 35.1 | 19.4 | 183 | from the risk difference interval |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | CHICA Control | This arm received CHICA without the asthma module~CHICA Control: This is CHICA without the asthma module, and was used as a control | 54 | 937 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | CHICA Asthma Module | This arm received the CHICA asthma module~CHICA Asthma Module: This module was added to CHICA to help diagnose and manage asthma | 87 | 1,010 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- PRIMARY
- Title
- Diagnosis Rate of Asthma
- Description
- Time frame
- one year
- Population
- We excluded those participants who had a previous diagnosis of asthma in the 14 months before the start of the study. This left the numbers seen above.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Using Computers to Assist in the Treatment of Asthma in a Pediatric Setting
- NCT number
- NCT01312805
- Phases
- NA
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Interventions
- CHICA Asthma Module, CHICA Control
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana University
- Results first posted
- 2017-02-02
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01312805?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01312805-ecd689c8