ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01314105-sae

Nintedanib 150mg vs Nintedanib 200mg: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Nintedanib 150mg vs Nintedanib 200mg: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01314105-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01314105-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.4290.1580.75wilson
Risk in group 20.3330.1380.609wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0952-0.2910.471newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.290.3994.15log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.50.2210.2log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Nintedanib 150mg than on Nintedanib 200mg10.5from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Nintedanib 150mg
Nintedanib (150 mg twice daily (BID), except the day of chemotherapy infusion) administered orally plus standard therapy of carboplatin (Area Under the Curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL\*min) and PLD (30 mg/m2) which were administered by intravenous infusion once every 28 days.
37EG000
Group 2Nintedanib 200mg
Nintedanib (200 mg twice daily (BID), except the day of chemotherapy infusion) administered orally plus standard therapy of carboplatin (Area Under the Curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL\*min) and PLD (30 mg/m2) which were administered by intravenous infusion once every 28 days.
412EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
From the first drug administration until 28 days after the last drug administration, up to 31months

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
BIBF 1120 + Carboplatin/Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Carcinoma or Primary Peritoneal Cancer
NCT number
NCT01314105
Phases
PHASE1
Conditions
Ovarian Neoplasms, Peritoneal Neoplasms
Interventions
BIBF 1120 + PLD 30 mg/m2 + CBDCA AUC5 mg/mL*min, BIBF 1120+ PLD 30 mg/m2 + CBDCA AUC5 mg/mL*min, BIBF 1120 + PLD 30 mg/m2 + CBDCA AUC5 mg/mL*min
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Results first posted
2014-11-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01314105-sae