ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01314911-bf6b31cd

Oseltamivir vs Placebo: Percentage of Participants With Virus Detectable by Quantitative PCR (qPCR) in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs at Day 3 -- Team Collected Samples

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Oseltamivir vs Placebo: Percentage of Participants With Virus Detectable by Quantitative PCR (qPCR) in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs at Day 3 -- Team Collected Samples. Trial comparisons, record NCT01314911-bf6b31cd. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01314911-bf6b31cd

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.450.3860.516wilson
Risk in group 20.5720.5070.634wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.122-0.212-0.0296newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.7870.6540.946log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.6120.4220.889log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Oseltamivir than on Placebo8.194.7233.8from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1OseltamivirOseltamivir: Subjects were prescribed Oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of Oseltamivir 75 mg.99220OG000
Group 2PlaceboPlacebo: Subjects were prescribed the matching placebo twice daily for 5 days, and each dose consisted of one capsule of placebo.131229OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Percentage of Participants With Virus Detectable by Quantitative PCR (qPCR) in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs at Day 3 -- Team Collected Samples
Description
The central laboratory performed a qualitative PCR test on the NP sample from Day 0 team collected swap in order to confirm influenza infection and to determine the influenza type and subtype. For participants with a positive influenza test result at Day 0 from this qualitative PCR testing, the laboratory then performed qPCR testing of subsequent samples to quantify viral shedding.
Time frame
At Day 3
Population
The population analyzed was restricted to the 455 participants who had a confirmed positive test (from team collected sample) for influenza by qPCR in the central laboratory testing and were not in the pilot study for IRC004. 6 participants (3 in each arm) had missing endpoint samples so were excluded from the analysis.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Evaluating the Use of Oseltamivir for the Treatment of Influenza in Adults
NCT number
NCT01314911
Phases
NA
Conditions
Influenza, Human
Interventions
Oseltamivir, Placebo
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Results first posted
2019-02-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01314911-bf6b31cd