ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01411852-sae

Standard Resuscitation (SR) vs Controlled Resuscitation (CR): serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Standard Resuscitation (SR) vs Controlled Resuscitation (CR): serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01411852-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01411852-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.08420.04330.157wilson
Risk in group 20.1880.1220.277wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.103-0.202-0.00505newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.4490.2050.983log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.3980.1640.968log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Standard Resuscitation (SR) than on Controlled Resuscitation (CR)9.684.96198from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Standard Resuscitation (SR)
Patients in the SR group received 2 liters of fluid as an initial bolus. Following the initial bolus, additional fluid was given a needed to maintain a SBP of 110 mmHg for the duration of the study period.
895EG000
Group 2Controlled Resuscitation (CR)
Patients in the CR group received a 250 milliliter (ml) bolus of saline only if their SBP was \< 70 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or they had no palpable radial pulse.~The total number of patients at risk is one less than the total number of patients enrolled. Regulatory restrictions for prisoners required that no data collection, including severe adverse events, be performed for the patient who was determined to have been in police custody at the time of enrollment.
1896EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Data were collected from the time the blinded study fluid kit was opened by the paramedic prior to hospital arrival to discharge, an average hospital stay of 7.6 days (SD 13.2).

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Field Trial of Hypotensive Versus Standard Resuscitation for Hemorrhagic Shock After Trauma
NCT number
NCT01411852
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Blunt Trauma, Penetrating Wound, Hemorrhagic Shock
Interventions
0.9% Sodium Chloride 250 mL bolus, 0.9% Sodium Chloride 2000 mL bolus
Lead sponsor
University of Washington
Results first posted
2014-10-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01411852-sae