ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01419665-77b7605e

GP2013 vs Rituximab: To Evaluate the Complete Response (CR) Rate During the Combination Treatment Period

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. GP2013 vs Rituximab: To Evaluate the Complete Response (CR) Rate During the Combination Treatment Period. Trial comparisons, record NCT01419665-77b7605e. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01419665-77b7605e

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1480.1130.192wilson
Risk in group 20.1340.1010.176wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0137-0.04120.0687newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.10.7481.62log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.120.7131.76log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on GP2013 than on Rituximab72.9from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1GP2013Experimental Type: Biological/Vaccine46311OG000
Group 2RituximabComparator Type: Biological/Vaccine42313OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
To Evaluate the Complete Response (CR) Rate During the Combination Treatment Period
Description
Time frame
24 weeks
Population
per protocol set, participants with measure

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
GP2013 in the Treatment of Patients With Previously Untreated, Advanced Stage Follicular Lymphoma (ASSIST_FL)
NCT number
NCT01419665
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Follicular Lymphoma
Interventions
GP2013, rituximab
Lead sponsor
Sandoz
Results first posted
2021-05-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01419665-77b7605e