ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01426555-sae

ZA Infusion Arm vs Rowing Arm: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. ZA Infusion Arm vs Rowing Arm: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01426555-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01426555-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2310.110.421wilson
Risk in group 20.3160.1540.54wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.085-0.3390.165newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.7310.2791.92log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.650.1722.46log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on ZA Infusion Arm than on Rowing Arm11.8from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1ZA Infusion ArmNo adverse event data were available for the remaining 9 participants.626EG000
Group 2Rowing ArmNo adverse event data were available for the remaining 16 participants.619EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Participants were followed up for the duration of the study for up to 4 years.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
FES-Rowing Versus Zoledronic Acid to Improve Bone Health in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
NCT number
NCT01426555
Phases
PHASE2, PHASE3
Conditions
Osteoporosis
Interventions
FES-Rowing, Zoledronic acid
Lead sponsor
Antonio Lazzari
Results first posted
2016-03-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01426555-sae