ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01443442-sae

Bepreve vs Alrex: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Bepreve vs Alrex: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01443442-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01443442-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 100.00000000000000002780.242wilson
Risk in group 2000.259wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.2590.242newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harmfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Bepreve1.5% bepotastine besilate, drops, twice per day, for two weeks~bepotastine besilate, 1.5%: Topical ocular aqueous formulation, oen drop per instillation, twice per day for 14 days012EG000
Group 2Alrextreatment with 0.2 % loteprednol etabonate, drops, four times per day~Loteprednol etabonate: Topical ocular aqueous formulation, one drop per instillation, four times per day for 14 days011EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Bepreve vs. Alrex in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Allergic Conjunctivitis
NCT number
NCT01443442
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Allergic Conjunctivitis
Interventions
bepotastine besilate, 1.5%, Loteprednol etabonate
Lead sponsor
Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University
Results first posted
2019-08-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01443442-sae