ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trial comparisons

FSC DPI vs FP DPI: Number of Participants Experiencing an Event in the Composite Safety Endpoint of Serious Asthma Outcomes ( Asthma-related Hospitalization, Asthma-related Endotracheal Intubation, or Asthma-related Death)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Measures 6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNoteSource
Risk in group 10.008690.005980.0126wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk in group 20.006770.004430.0103wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00192-0.002560.00649newcombe hybrid scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.280.7272.26logClinicalTrials.gov
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.290.7252.28logClinicalTrials.gov
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on FSC DPI than on FP DPI521from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no differenceClinicalTrials.gov

Groups 2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov codeSource
Group 1FSC DPI
Participants were randomized to either FSC or FP, and the treatment dose was based on participants' asthma control status. There was no intent to compare the dosage levels received, therefore participants were combined for comparison regardless of dosage. In this treatment arm, participants received one of following treatments: FSC 100/50 microgram (µg) or FSC 250/50 µg as one inhalation twice daily (BID) (approximately 12 hours apart) via Dry powder inhaler (DPI) during the 6 month treatment period. Rescue medication (albuterol/salbutamol) via metered dose inhaler (MDI) was permitted during study treatment.
273,107OG000ClinicalTrials.gov
Group 2FP DPI
Participants were randomized to either FSC or FP, and the treatment dose was based on participants' asthma control status. There was no intent to compare the dosage levels received, therefore participants were combined for comparison regardless of dosage. In this treatment arm, participants received one of the following treatments: FP 100 µg or FP 250 µg as one inhalation BID (approximately 12 hours apart) via DPI during the 6 month treatment period. Rescue medication (albuterol/salbutamol) via MDI was permitted during study treatment.
213,101OG001ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcome 5

FieldValueSource
TypePRIMARYClinicalTrials.gov
Title
Number of Participants Experiencing an Event in the Composite Safety Endpoint of Serious Asthma Outcomes ( Asthma-related Hospitalization, Asthma-related Endotracheal Intubation, or Asthma-related Death)
ClinicalTrials.gov
Description
Composite endpoint was defined as clinically relevant endpoint that is constructed from combinations of other clinically relevant endpoints of serious asthma outcomes (i.e., asthma-related hospitalization, asthma-related endotracheal intubation, or asthma-related death). Hospitalization was defined as an inpatient stay or a \>=24-hour stay in an observation area in an emergency department or other equivalent facility. Time to first event in the composite endpoint of serious asthma-related outcomes over the 6-month study treatment period was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. An estimate of absolute risk difference and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were also included. The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population included all participants randomized to study drug and who took study treatment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frameFrom Day 1 up to 6 monthsClinicalTrials.gov
PopulationITT PopulationClinicalTrials.gov

Trial 8

FieldValueSource
Title6-month Safety and Benefit Study of ADVAIR in Children 4-11 Years OldClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT01462344ClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesPHASE4ClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsAsthmaClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsADVAIR 100/50mcg, ADVAIR 250/50mcg, FLOVENT 100mcg, FLOVENT 250mcgClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorGlaxoSmithKlineClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2016-10-05ClinicalTrials.gov
Results on ClinicalTrials.govhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01462344?tab=resultsClinicalTrials.gov

Source 4

FieldValueSource
Releasetrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-256f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57ClinicalTrials.gov
AACT copy2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
Tables readoutcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquetClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.