ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01468675-ccb91540

Intervention vs Control: Number of Subjects Who Discussed Disease Risk With Primary Care Provider

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Intervention vs Control: Number of Subjects Who Discussed Disease Risk With Primary Care Provider. Trial comparisons, record NCT01468675-ccb91540. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01468675-ccb91540

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.5410.5170.565wilson
Risk in group 20.4550.4330.478wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.08560.05260.118newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.191.111.27log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.411.231.61log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Intervention than on Control11.78.4519from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: control.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1InterventionValidated, web-based risk assessment is being used to assess personalized risk and generate a risk report~risk assessment survey; decision support for providers for prevention based on risk9051,673OG000
Group 2ControlUsual care8411,847OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Number of Subjects Who Discussed Disease Risk With Primary Care Provider
Description
Time frame
3 months following primary care visit
Population
1673+1847 (Total=3520) is the total number of subjects who answered the question that this outcome is derived from. (During your last doctor visit, did you talk to your PCP about your risk of developing cancer, heart disease or diabetes.) The total number of subjects included in the analysis is 3703.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Health Information Technology (HIT) Enhanced Family History Documentation and Management in Primary Care
NCT number
NCT01468675
Phases
NA
Conditions
Colorectal Cancer, Breast Cancer, Coronary Heart Disease, Diabetes
Interventions
Intervention
Lead sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Results first posted
2017-04-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01468675-ccb91540