ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01468675-sae

Intervention vs Control: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Intervention vs Control: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01468675-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01468675-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 1000.00226wilson
Risk in group 200.0000000000000000001080.00191wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.001910.00226newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harmfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: control.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Intervention
Intervention subjects completed a risk factors/perceptions assessment and received a 1 page Health Risk Assessment (HRA) prior to a primary care visit. This coded data was sent to the EHR. After their primary care visit, subjects again reported risk perception.
01,699EG000
Group 2ControlControl subjects completed a risk factors/perceptions assessment and received a 1 page Health Risk Assessment (HRA) AFTER their primary care visit. Coded data was not sent to the EHR.02,004EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Health Information Technology (HIT) Enhanced Family History Documentation and Management in Primary Care
NCT number
NCT01468675
Phases
NA
Conditions
Colorectal Cancer, Breast Cancer, Coronary Heart Disease, Diabetes
Interventions
Intervention
Lead sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Results first posted
2017-04-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01468675-sae