ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01486446-sae

XPF-002 vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. XPF-002 vs Placebo: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01486446-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01486446-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1430.02570.513wilson
Risk in group 2000.793wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.143-0.6590.513newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on XPF-002 than on Placebo7from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1XPF-002XEN402 8% w/w ointment for topical application, applied to the skin twice daily for 14 or 21 days17EG000
Group 2PlaceboXEN402 0% w/w ointment for topical application. Identical content and appearance to the XPF-002 ointment but without the active medicine. Applied to the skin twice daily for 14 or 21 days.01EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Phase 2a, Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of XPF-002 in Patients With Primary/Inherited Erythromelalgia
NCT number
NCT01486446
Phases
PHASE1, PHASE2
Conditions
Primary Erythromelalgia, Inherited Erythromelalgia
Interventions
XPF-002, Placebo
Lead sponsor
Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Results first posted
2014-04-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01486446-sae