ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01499511-sae

ASCOT Participants Amlodipine vs ASCOT Participants Atenolol: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. ASCOT Participants Amlodipine vs ASCOT Participants Atenolol: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01499511-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01499511-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.002260.000620.0082wilson
Risk in group 2000.00459wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00226-0.002610.0082newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on ASCOT Participants Amlodipine than on ASCOT Participants Atenolol443from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1ASCOT Participants AmlodipineFollow up study for amlodipine, no intervention.2885EG000
Group 2ASCOT Participants AtenololFollow up study for atenolol, no intervention.0833EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
16 years

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial: Post Trial Follow-Up Study
NCT number
NCT01499511
Phases
Conditions
Hypertension, Diabetes, Death From Cardiovascular Disease, Myocardial Infarction, Stroke
Interventions
Lead sponsor
Imperial College London
Results first posted
2019-12-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01499511-sae