ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01545817-sae

Pazopanib vs Everolimus: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Pazopanib vs Everolimus: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01545817-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01545817-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.6350.5210.736wilson
Risk in group 20.4210.2790.578wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.2140.02010.388newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.5112.27log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.391.085.32log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Pazopanib than on Everolimus4.672.5749.6from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Pazopanib
All patients were assigned to first-line treatment with pazopanib once daily. Pazopanib was supplied as 200 mg and 400 mg tablets. Pazopanib was administered once daily at the approved recommended dose of 800 mg/day (two 400 mg tablets, treatment taken once daily). The 200 mg tablets were provided to patients who needed dose adjustment.
4774EG000
Group 2Everolimus
Patients who progressed during or within 6 months after stopping pazopanib treatment were eligible to then receive everolimus once daily (10 mg) as second-line treatment.~Everolimus was supplied to the study sites as 5 mg and 10 mg tablets. The 5 mg tablets were provided to patients who needed dose adjustments.
1638EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Adverse events for each intervention were assessed from the time of first dose of treatment to approximately one month after discontinuation of the last dose of treatment, up to 4 years.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Everolimus Post Pazopanib Treatment in Metastatic or Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
NCT number
NCT01545817
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Interventions
Pazopanib followed by everolimus
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Results first posted
2019-10-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01545817-sae