ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01577537-aa8bb4be

VivaGel vs HEC Placebo: Number of Women With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure Visit (TOC)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. VivaGel vs HEC Placebo: Number of Women With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure Visit (TOC). Trial comparisons, record NCT01577537-aa8bb4be. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01577537-aa8bb4be

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2830.210.37wilson
Risk in group 20.2820.2080.37wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00128-0.1130.115newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 210.671.51log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.010.5721.77log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on VivaGel than on HEC Placebo780from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1VivaGel1% SPL7013 Gel: Vaginal gel, daily for 7 days34120OG000
Group 2HEC PlaceboPlacebo: Vaginal gel, daily for 7 days33117OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Women With Clinical Cure at the Test of Cure Visit (TOC)
Description
Clinical Cure is defined as the resolution of clinical findings (ie Amsel criteria) from the Baseline visit (Day 1)
Time frame
Day 21-30
Population
mITT

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Phase 3 Study of SPL7013 Gel (VivaGel) for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis
NCT number
NCT01577537
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Bacterial Vaginosis
Interventions
1% SPL7013 Gel, Placebo
Lead sponsor
Starpharma Pty Ltd
Results first posted
2019-07-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01577537-aa8bb4be