Comparison · NCT01583101-7a64c17d
Receiving Highlighted Prompts vs Receiving Non-highlighted Prompts: The Number of Prompts That Were Responded to
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Receiving Highlighted Prompts vs Receiving Non-highlighted Prompts: The Number of Prompts That Were Responded to. Trial comparisons, record NCT01583101-7a64c17d. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01583101-7a64c17d
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.625 | 0.595 | 0.653 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.613 | 0.585 | 0.641 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0.0113 | -0.029 | 0.0514 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.02 | 0.954 | 1.09 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.05 | 0.884 | 1.24 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Receiving Highlighted Prompts than on Receiving Non-highlighted Prompts | 88.7 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Receiving Highlighted Prompts | Prompts received by physicians were highlighted. | 672 | 1,076 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Receiving Non-highlighted Prompts | Prompts received by physicians were not highlighted. | 712 | 1,161 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- PRIMARY
- Title
- The Number of Prompts That Were Responded to
- Description
- The main outcome of interest is whether or not a prompt was answered (discussed/not discussed).
- Time frame
- 1 year
- Population
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Child Health Improvement Through Computer Automation (CHICA) Highlighting Study
- NCT number
- NCT01583101
- Phases
- NA
- Conditions
- Physician Behavior
- Interventions
- Receiving Highlighted Prompts, Receiving Non-highlighted Prompts
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana University
- Results first posted
- 2017-03-23
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01583101?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01583101-7a64c17d