ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01639443-d71b04ec

Fast-tracked vs Control: Daily Service Denials (Bumps)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Fast-tracked vs Control: Daily Service Denials (Bumps). Trial comparisons, record NCT01639443-d71b04ec. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01639443-d71b04ec

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 100.000000000000000003470.0335wilson
Risk in group 20.01860.0130.0266wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0186-0.02660.0153newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Fast-tracked than on Control53.8from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: control.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Fast-tracked
Patients who volunteer to enroll in fast-track line, which gives them an opportunity to overbook their appointment for endoscopy earlier in a predictive no-show slots.~Predictive no-show overbooking: During intervention period, every Veteran scheduled for an upper endoscopy will be offered fast-track offer, which gives them a chance to get their endoscopy procedure done earlier than usual scheduling by overbooking their appointment in a predictive no-show slot.
0111OG000
Group 2ControlPatients who are scheduled routinely291,561OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Daily Service Denials (Bumps)
Description
The investigators will compare the number of patients bumped per day between scheduling approaches
Time frame
After 12 months of running study in clinic
Population
These 1672 patients are a subset of all patients who were enrolled in this study. We dropped data on a first wave of participants (69 Fast-tracked and 3294 Controls) because of problems incorporating recruitment strategy into clinic. However, data from these individuals was used to build predictive model.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Reducing VA No-Shows: Evaluation of Predictive Overbooking Applied to Colonoscopy
NCT number
NCT01639443
Phases
NA
Conditions
Colon Cancer
Interventions
Predictive no-show overbooking
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Results first posted
2016-10-31

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01639443-d71b04ec