ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01643616-sae

Group US vs Group NS: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Group US vs Group NS: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01643616-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01643616-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 100.000000000000000001730.0298wilson
Risk in group 20.0080.001410.0439wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.008-0.04390.0225newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Group US than on Group NS125from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Group USUltrasound guided block :~20ml Prilocaine 1% and 10ml Ropivacaine 0.75% (30ml Prilocaine 1% in outpatients)0125EG000
Group 2Group NSNerve stimulation technique:~20ml Prilocaine 1% and 10ml Ropivacaine 0.75% (30ml Prilocaine 1% in outpatients)1125EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Ultrasound Guided Distal Sciatic Nerve Block - a Comparison With Nerve Stimulator Technique
NCT number
NCT01643616
Phases
NA
Conditions
Other Surgical Procedures
Interventions
midazolam, Prilocaine 1%, Ropivacaine 0.75%, Prilocaine 1%, ultrasound guidance, nerve stimulation technique
Lead sponsor
Helios Research Center
Results first posted
2013-11-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01643616-sae