ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01650805-sae

Ponatinib 45 mg vs Imatinib 400 mg: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Ponatinib 45 mg vs Imatinib 400 mg: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01650805-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01650805-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.3180.250.395wilson
Risk in group 20.08550.05070.141wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.2330.1450.317newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 23.722.116.57log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 24.992.579.67log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Ponatinib 45 mg than on Imatinib 400 mg4.33.156.91from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Ponatinib 45 mgponatinib: 45 mg tablet, taken orally once daily49154EG000
Group 2Imatinib 400 mgimatinib (Gleevec/ Glivec): 400 mg tablet, taken orally once daily13152EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Patients were followed-up for AEs from the time of informed consent until 30 days after the close of the trial. The median follow-up was 4.97 months (range: 0.03, 17.57) for ponatinib patients, and 5.32 months (range: 0.49, 14.05) for imatinib patients.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Ponatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) (EPIC)
NCT number
NCT01650805
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Interventions
ponatinib, imatinib (Gleevec/ Glivec)
Lead sponsor
Ariad Pharmaceuticals
Results first posted
2014-10-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01650805-sae