ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01652690-sae

Czech Republic vs Slovakia: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Czech Republic vs Slovakia: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01652690-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01652690-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 100.0000000000000000008670.0126wilson
Risk in group 20.003330.0005890.0186wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.00333-0.01860.0096newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Czech Republic than on Slovakia300from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Czech RepublicPatients in the Czech Republic with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care.0300EG000
Group 2SlovakiaPatients in Slovakia with postmenopausal osteoporosis who received at least 1 injection of denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months as part of their routine clinical care.1300EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
24 months

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Prospective Observational Study to Describe Characteristics and Management of Patients Treated With Denosumab (Prolia®) in Routine Clinical Practice
NCT number
NCT01652690
Phases
Conditions
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
Interventions
Denosumab
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Results first posted
2016-05-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01652690-sae