ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01699503-sae

Screening Group vs No Screening: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Screening Group vs No Screening: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01699503-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01699503-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.03020.02310.0394wilson
Risk in group 20.02780.02090.0367wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00242-0.009010.0139newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.090.7371.6log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.090.731.63log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Screening Group than on No Screening413from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Screening Group
Subjects who are randomized into the screening arm of the study will be screened by the MIS. Subjects with MIS score of less than 5 points will be referred to the Collaborative Dementia Care Program for a subsequent diagnostic assessment, counseling and management.~Collaborative Dementia Care Program: Much of the intervention, facilitated by care coordinator, is targeted to co-manage or support the practice behavior of primary care clinicians, enhance self-management skills of both the care-recipient and the informal caregiver, and maximize the coping behavior of the patient and the informal caregiver.
521,723EG000
Group 2No ScreeningSubjects who are randomized into the non-screening arm will receive the usual standard of care.471,693EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
1 year

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Indiana University Dementia Screening Trial
NCT number
NCT01699503
Phases
NA
Conditions
Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment
Interventions
Collaborative Dementia Care Program
Lead sponsor
Indiana University
Results first posted
2019-01-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01699503-sae